Racing Authority open and upfront with rule making process 8/31/07 KyHarnessRacing.com
In the NBA, rules are made with the best interest of the sport in mind. The NBA has a rule committee that oversees the rule making process. This committee is made up of several people from the sport. It is someone from the owner's organization, a player's representative, officiating organization.... there is someone from every part of the industry. The reason for this is to keep balance and fairness in the rule making process. If it was just the owners making the rules, then rules would be biased to the best interest for the owners of the sport. The rule making process in harness racing isn't much different than in the NBA. Why are new rules made in harness racing? "Rules are made to lookout for the best interest of the sport." says John Forgy - Counsel for the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority. "Rules are made out of necessity. For example, after Hal Belote was killed in a racing accident at Harrington, we began to explore the necessity of safety vests." says Marc Guilfoil, Deputy Executive Director for the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority.
Who introduces new rules? It could be as simple as someone taking interest on a certain issue or rule. Or, an association has communicated with the Racing Authority on introducing a rule. Whatever the rule, it will be everyone working together to better serve the public or to increase safety on the racetrack. Once a rule has been introduced, the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority will have the new rule drafted and filed with the Legislative Research Committee. It is not unusual for several rules to be filed at the same time. "We work with everyone", John Forgy continues, "Anyone that would like, can sign up to receive a copy of the rules before they are filed." "We are open and upfront with any rule in process. We want the imput from everyone, Associations, Racetracks, Breeders etc." states Guilfoil. Five days after a new rule is filed there is a public comment and written comment period. There is also a pubic hearing, of which a notice is sent out to several organizations and people in the industry, including the KHHA. "It is much more efficient to talk about a rule before it becomes a rule." says Forgy.
With the new safety vest rule, the process was handled the same as any other rule. In fact, the safety vest section is in the same rule (Racing and track rules) that the naming of the track committee is in. This part of the process is done to get feedback or imput from the horsemen's association and such. The KHHA was given material on all the proposed rule changes on two separate occasions to present to the KHHA board before August 1st 2006. The only feedback the Racing Authority received from the KHHA was on the track committee rule and breaking rule. The Racing Authority did not receive any feedback from anyone on the safety vest rule.
A public hearing was in September of 2006. Again, no one spoke about the safety vest rule at that public hearing. In fact, there wasn't anyone from the KHHA Board present at that meeting. Dr. Overstreet was in attendance and spoke about the fair rule. Alan Leavitt was in attendance and spoke about the drug rule. Nobody opposed the safety vest rule, or had any suggestions.
On June 1, 2007, these rules became effective. You may find out any new rules that are in process by emailing the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority.
"If something is going to affect your life, it's best to know as much as you can about it." - Donald Trump