Racing Authority open and upfront with
rule making process
8/31/07 KyHarnessRacing.com

    In the NBA, rules are made with the best interest of
    the sport in mind. The NBA has a rule committee
    that oversees the rule making process. This
    committee is made up of several people from the
    sport. It is someone from the owner's organization,
    a player's representative, officiating organization....
    there is someone from every part of the industry.
    The reason for this is to keep balance and fairness in
    the rule making process. If it was just the owners
    making the rules, then rules would be biased to the
    best interest for the owners of the sport. The rule
    making process in harness racing isn't much different
    than in the NBA.


    Why are new rules made in harness racing? "Rules
    are made to lookout for the best interest of the
    sport." says John Forgy - Counsel for the Kentucky
    Horse Racing Authority. "Rules are made out of
    necessity. For example, after Hal Belote was killed in
    a racing accident at Harrington, we began to explore
    the necessity of safety vests." says Marc Guilfoil,
    Deputy Executive Director for the Kentucky Horse
    Racing Authority.


    Who introduces new rules? It could be as simple as
    someone taking interest on a certain issue or rule.
    Or, an association has communicated with the Racing
    Authority on introducing a rule. Whatever the rule, it
    will be everyone working together to better serve the
    public or to increase safety on the racetrack.


    Once a rule has been introduced, the Kentucky Horse
    Racing Authority will have the new rule drafted and
    filed with the Legislative Research Committee. It is
    not unusual for several rules to be filed at the same
    time. "We work with everyone", John Forgy
    continues, "Anyone that would like, can sign up to
    receive a copy of the rules before they are filed."


    "We are open and upfront with any rule in process.
    We want the imput from everyone, Associations,
    Racetracks, Breeders etc." states Guilfoil. Five days
    after a new rule is filed there is a public comment and
    written comment period. There is also a pubic
    hearing, of which a notice is sent out to several
    organizations and people in the industry, including
    the KHHA. "It is much more efficient to talk about a
    rule before it becomes a rule." says Forgy.


    With the new safety vest rule, the process was
    handled the same as any other rule. In fact, the
    safety vest section is in the same rule (Racing and
    track rules) that the naming of the track committee
    is in. This part of the process is done to get
    feedback or imput from the horsemen's association
    and such. The KHHA was given material on all the
    proposed rule changes on two separate occasions to
    present to the KHHA board before August 1st 2006.
    The only feedback the Racing Authority received from
    the KHHA was on the track committee rule and
    breaking rule. The Racing Authority did not receive
    any feedback from anyone on the safety vest rule.


    A public hearing was in September of 2006. Again,
    no one spoke about the safety vest rule at that
    public hearing. In fact, there wasn't anyone from the
    KHHA Board present at that meeting. Dr. Overstreet
    was in attendance and spoke about the fair rule.  
    Alan Leavitt was in attendance and spoke about the
    drug rule. Nobody opposed the safety vest rule, or
    had any suggestions.

    On June 1, 2007, these rules became effective. You
    may find out any new rules that are in process by
    emailing the Kentucky Horse Racing Authority.
"If something is going to affect your life, it's best to know as much as you can about it." - Donald Trump